FB
F-lightBook Documentation

title: “Flight Supply Strategy — Complete Findings & Decision Framework” category: Supply Strategy status: Draft created: 2026-02-25 related:


Section Index · Master Index


Flight Supply Strategy — Complete Findings & Decision Framework

Executive Summary

This document consolidates all findings from our discussions regarding flight supply strategies:

  • OTA Model — redirect-based, capital-light, fastest time-to-market
  • NDC / Direct Airline Integration (DAI) — higher margins, higher complexity
  • Hybrid Model — phased approach balancing speed, risk, and margin growth

It includes operational, technical, commercial, and strategic insights to support a board-level decision.

[!IMPORTANT] This is not a technical preference decision. It is a capital allocation, risk management, and long-term positioning decision.


1. How Meta-Search Platforms Work

Meta-search platforms perform five core functions:

  1. Aggregate supply from multiple providers (OTAs, airlines, aggregators)
  2. Normalize and deduplicate itineraries
  3. Rank and display comparable flight options
  4. Redirect users (or optionally handle checkout)
  5. Track click attribution for revenue

[!NOTE] Key realities:

  • Not all airlines are queried directly — supply comes through intermediaries
  • APIs are called in parallel with timeouts and caching
  • Prices can change due to offer expiration or inventory changes — “price mismatch” is inherent to the model

2. OTA Model

What It Is

OTA Model Concept

You integrate multiple Online Travel Agencies (OTAs). Users compare prices on your platform and are redirected to the OTA to book.

sequenceDiagram
    actor User
    participant Meta as Meta-Search Platform
    participant OTA as OTA Supplier

    User->>Meta: Search Flights
    Meta->>OTA: Query Inventory (Parallel)
    OTA-->>Meta: Return Offers
    Meta->>User: Display Comparison
    User->>Meta: Click Offer
    Meta->>OTA: Redirect User to OTA Check-out
    Note over OTA: OTA handles Payment, Ticketing & Support
    User->>OTA: Complete Booking

Platform Responsibilities

Responsibility Description
Search UI Display flight results with filters and sorting
Deduplication Merge identical itineraries from multiple sources
Provider comparison Show price differences across OTAs
Redirect tracking Track click-throughs for CPC/CPA revenue

Advantages

  • Fast time-to-market — minimal infrastructure needed
  • Low operational complexity — no payment or refund handling
  • Capital-light — no working capital exposure or float risk

Disadvantages

  • Lower margins — limited to CPC/CPA commission
  • No booking ownership — users don’t have booking history in your system
  • Partner dependency — reliant on OTA reliability and data accuracy

Refund & Booking History

  • Managed entirely by the OTA
  • Users do NOT have booking history in your system
  • Support burden falls on the OTA, not you

3. NDC / Direct Airline Integration (DAI)

What It Is

NDC Model Concept

Integration with airline retail APIs using the NDC (New Distribution Capability) standard — an IATA protocol that enables airlines to sell directly through third-party platforms.

sequenceDiagram
    actor User
    participant Meta as Meta-Search Platform
    participant NDC as Airline NDC API

    User->>Meta: Search Flights
    Meta->>NDC: AirShoppingReq
    NDC-->>Meta: AirShoppingRS (Offers)
    Meta->>User: Display Results
    User->>Meta: Select Offer
    Meta->>NDC: OfferPriceReq (Confirm Price)
    NDC-->>Meta: OfferPriceRS
    User->>Meta: Checkout & Pay
    Note over Meta: Meta handles PCI/Payment
    Meta->>NDC: OrderCreateReq (Issue Ticket)
    NDC-->>Meta: OrderViewRS (Ticket Issued)
    Note over Meta: Meta handles Refunds & Support

NDC Lifecycle

flowchart LR
    A[AirShopping] --> B[OfferPrice]
    B --> C[OrderCreate]
    C --> D[OrderChange]
    C --> E[OrderCancel]
Stage Purpose
AirShopping Browse available offers
OfferPrice Confirm pricing for a specific offer
OrderCreate Complete the booking and issue ticket
OrderChange Modify dates, passengers, or ancillaries
OrderCancel Cancel the booking and process refund

Advantages

  • Higher margin potential — markup + commission
  • Richer ancillary content — seat selection, baggage, meals
  • Airline differentiation — access to exclusive fares and bundles
  • Brand ownership — you own the customer relationship

Disadvantages

  • High technical complexity — Offer → Order lifecycle is non-trivial
  • Offer expiration — offers have TTLs (time-to-live) and can expire mid-checkout
  • Servicing burden — refund/change processing falls on you
  • Payment compliance — PCI-DSS certification required
  • Airline variability — each airline implements NDC differently

4. Why Multiple Integrations Are Needed

Even with NDC integration:

Challenge Explanation
Coverage fragmentation NDC is per-airline — no single source covers all carriers
Airline variability Each airline implements NDC differently (schema, flow, features)
Commercial differences Commission rates, incentives, and terms vary per airline
Resilience Multi-supplier architecture provides redundancy and failover

[!NOTE] Even with an aggregator like Verteil or Duffel, multi-sourcing may be required for full corridor coverage and negotiation leverage.


Hybrid Model Concept

Structure

Phase Activity Focus
Phase 1 Multiple OTAs Early revenue, optimize unit economics
Phase 2 Add selective NDC/DAI High-volume routes, margin improvement
Phase 3 Optional limited checkout Only after compliance & ops readiness

Benefits

  • ✅ Early revenue with reduced risk
  • ✅ Gradual margin improvement as NDC is added
  • ✅ Controlled complexity growth
  • ✅ Preserves future optionality

Decision Gate

Proceed to NDC phase ONLY if:
  Incremental Margin > Incremental Operational Cost + Risk Premium

Cross-reference: See Aggregated Reference § Hybrid Model for the full phased roadmap with Gantt chart.


6. Supplier Landscape Overview

Provider Type Complexity Startup Fit Best For
Verteil NDC Aggregator Medium Moderate GCC corridor airlines (Emirates, Etihad, Qatar)
Duffel Modern Airline API Medium High Developer-first builds, broad global coverage
Travelfusion Direct Connect + LCC High Moderate LCC-heavy markets
TPConnects NDC Aggregator Medium Moderate GCC-focused aggregation
Amadeus GDS + NDC Very High Low Enterprise-scale operations
Sabre GDS + NDC Very High Low Enterprise-scale operations
Travelport GDS + NDC Very High Low Enterprise-scale operations
Kiwi OTA Low–Medium High Fast OTA model, virtual interlining

Cross-reference: See Duffel vs Verteil for a detailed head-to-head comparison.


7. Strategic Trade-Off Matrix

Dimension OTA Hybrid NDC Heavy
Time to Market ✅ High ⚡ Medium ❌ Low
Margin Potential ❌ Low ⚡ Medium ✅ High
Risk ✅ Low ⚡ Medium ❌ High
Operational Burden ✅ Low ⚡ Medium ❌ High
Capital Requirement ✅ Low ⚡ Medium ❌ High
quadrantChart
    title Supply Model Risk vs Margin Profile
    x-axis Low Risk --> High Risk
    y-axis Low Margin --> High Margin
    quadrant-1 High Risk & Reward (NDC Heavy)
    quadrant-2 Balanced Growth (Hybrid)
    quadrant-3 Fast & Safe (OTA Only)
    quadrant-4 Low Value (Avoid)
    "OTA Only": [0.15, 0.2]
    "NDC Heavy": [0.85, 0.85]
    "Hybrid": [0.45, 0.65]

8. Weighted Decision Framework

The final decision should be weighted against these factors:

Factor Implication
Time-to-market urgency Higher urgency → favor OTA
Capital availability Less capital → favor OTA; more → consider NDC
Risk tolerance Risk-averse → OTA; risk-tolerant → NDC
Margin ambition Higher margin targets → NDC
Engineering maturity Junior team → OTA; experienced → Hybrid/NDC
Operational readiness No ops team → OTA; ops team → Hybrid/NDC

Quick Decision Guide

If you prioritize… → Choose
Speed & safety OTA
Margin & ownership NDC Heavy
Balanced growth Hybrid

9. Board-Level Framing

[!CAUTION] This is not a technical choice. It is:

  • A capital allocation decision
  • A risk management decision
  • A long-term positioning decision

The board must define risk tolerance, capital envelope, and 3-year positioning goals before selecting a path.


For most startups, the recommended path is:

flowchart LR
    A["1. Launch with OTA\n(Months 0–6)"] --> B["2. Optimize Unit Economics\n(Months 3–9)"]
    B --> C["3. Add Selective NDC\n(Months 6–12)"]
    C --> D["4. Consider Checkout\n(Month 12+)"]
  1. Launch with multiple OTA integrations
  2. Optimize unit economics (CTR, conversion, supplier quality)
  3. Add selective NDC on high-volume routes where margin uplift justifies complexity
  4. Consider on-platform checkout only after compliance and ops readiness are confirmed

Final Conclusion

The Hybrid strategy provides the best balance between:

  • ⚡ Speed
  • 🛡️ Risk
  • 💰 Margin
  • 🔄 Optionality

However, the final decision must align with:

  • Geography — which corridors are highest priority
  • Funding — available capital and burn rate
  • Ambition — margin targets and market positioning goals
  • Operational capacity — team size and maturity

Quick Flashcards

What is the primary trade-off of the OTA Model vs. the NDC Model?

OTA model offers fast time-to-market with lower operational risk but yields smaller margins (CPC). NDC offers high margin and customer ownership but requires deep technical investment and handles full checkout/support complexity.

Why is a Hybrid Strategy recommended for most startups?

It allows a startup to generate early revenue rapidly through standard OTAs, validating the product, before selectively deploying capital-intensive NDC integrations on high-volume routes.


Prepared as a consolidated strategic reference document.

Section Index · Master Index

Last modified: Feb 26, 2026 by George Joseph (a4fadf9)